Your search results

The leadership entirely ignores those sections, don’t they?

Posted by admin on June 24, 2022
0

The leadership entirely ignores those sections, don’t they?

And if the prohibition is based upon the fact that it is a civil crime, what of those in countries where it is not against the law to practice polygamy?

That reminds me, when was the last time anyone ever quoted any portions of D&C 132 that dealt with plural marriage in general conference? I wonder what would happen if someone got up in church during fast and testimony meeting and started reading from those sections and bearing testimony of them? Would they be asked to step down?

I decided to answer my own question and look up on when the last time anyone in general conference quoted any of the plural e across a talk given by Gordon B. Hinckley during the October 1998 General Conference, where he answered some questions that people were typically asking. One question had to do with polygamy:

One cannot obey the law and disobey the law at the same time

We are faced these days with many newspaper articles on this subject. This has arisen out of a case of alleged child abuse on the part of some of those practicing plural marriage.

I wish to state categorically that this Church has nothing whatever to do with those practicing polygamy. They are not members of this Church. Most of them have never been members. They are in violation of the civil law. They know they are in violation of the law. They are subject to its penalties. The Church, of course, has no jurisdiction whatever in this matter. Continue Reading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Compare Listings

.float{ position:fixed; width:60px; height:60px; bottom:40px; right:40px; background-color:#25d366; color:#FFF; border-radius:50px; text-align:center; box-shadow: 2px 2px 3px #999; } .my-float{ margin-top:16px; }